>>61622>Two Heterodox The second guy is a Roman Catholic, see
https://paulist.org/who-we-are/our-history/>and a RabbiWhat did he say that isn't true? Which of the true things he said are things which Catholic priests have the balls to tell their congregations in public?
If you prefer to hear from the Church Fathers, here you go:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=WUdQF5AqPBM
>So Christ IS coming back?Sure, they're gonna roll out a Kosher Christ in compliance with the Noahide Laws.
>Iconography isn't idolatry.Cope. Moses, Prophet Ezra or King David would've had Jesus worshipers stoned. Worshiping a man is idolatrous polytheism.
You betray your ancestors by selling your soul to the king of a hostile nation for an empty promise of going to heaven, just as Esau betrayed his ancestors when he sold his birthright for a pot of lentils.
>They aren't Christian.Ah, no true scotsmen.
>What rock are you standing on?Peter was a Jewish/Pharisee agent btw, Jews fast in his honor to this day: See
https://youtube.com/watch?v=oTBgYWFvsioNow you might reject this claim because it's Jews who are making it, but the Church has been thoroughly infiltrated by Freemasons and others who have pushed through liberal pro-Jewish nonsense like Vatican II. How can such a corrupt institution possibly be divine?
Christianity as preached by Paul was at best a grift to extract money from non-Jews, as Romans 15:27 indicates:
<if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings.More than likely it was deliberately used as a weapon to subvert the Roman Empire, much like Marxism is being used to subvert us today.
If there is any truth to its supernatural elements, then it was a blood magic ritual akin to the one described in Leviticus 16 in which the sins of the Jews and higher-ups of the Church are transferred onto ordinary Christians like you.