[ home ] [ q / soy / qa / r / nate ] [ a / health / incel / int / mtv / pol / psy / raid / sci ] [ overboard ] [ rules ] [ bans ] [ wiki ] [ booru ] [ archive ] [ merch ] [ donate ]

/pol/ - Politics

Name
Options
Comment
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

No NAS weekends are here to stay. NAS replies are permitted but discouraged. Use /qa/ for sfw NAS and /nate/ for nsfw NAS.

File: 1689917319735.jpg (26.24 KB, 447x313, Screenshot_2023-06-03_2042….jpg)ImgOps

 61620

What are the implications of this model? Will academia ever accept something saying that 'gers have way more DNA from some archaic non human species ?

 61702

Gemmy autismerald

My thoughts:
1 000 000BP - Ancestral is homo heidelbergensis
1 000 000BP - Ancestral split into the most niggerish race (stem 2) that stayed in West Africa and one less niggerish (stem 1) that went to East Africa
700 000 BP - part of East African heidelbergensis went to Eurasia and became Neanderthal and Denisovan varieties, another part stays in Africa becoming homo rhodesiensis
300 000 BP - homo rhodesiensis become homo sapiens, gradually splits into Khoisanoid and Negroeurasianoid
100 000 BP - Negroeurasianoid mutts with 2 existing human (homo sapiens) races
70 000 BP - Mainstream negroids split from Ethioeurasianoids
65 000 BP - Eurasians and Ethiopic-Nilotics split
20 000 BP - negroids move to West Africa and absorbs the most niggeric homo heidelbergensis
10 000 BP - some Middle Easterns mutts with proto-Negroids making Kishites
1000 BC - mainstream Negroids genocide Khoisanoids



[Return][Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home ] [ q / soy / qa / r / nate ] [ a / health / incel / int / mtv / pol / psy / raid / sci ] [ overboard ] [ rules ] [ bans ] [ wiki ] [ booru ] [ archive ] [ merch ] [ donate ]