/pol/ - Politics

I recently saw the video where Louis Farrakhan says that by elevating the status of white people you deprive BIPOC and now I think that I have a pretty good understanding of anti-whiteness.

So, why do we have so many nonwhite groups that organize and fight for their own group interests but none for whites? The explanation nonwhites have for this is interesting. You see, they operate under a totally different moral framework than race-aware whites do, and by understanding this we can better combat it.

Firstly, according to the antiwhites, whiteness is a racist social construct created to oppress people of color and deprive them of their land and resources. Because it is essentially a creation myth invented for economic and social gains, it has no basis in reality. Being "white" is then not biological, but purely socio-cultural, and has no bearing on your ability to succeed. The reason why whites are successful is because (according to them) they used their social construct of white identity to take all of the positions of power, resources, and capital for themselves. All inequality is then directly the fault of whites.

Secondly, since white identity is false due to by nature being racist and oppressive, nonwhite identities are justified in fighting against it. Nonwhites are entitled to the same privileges and status as whites, and the only way to gain this under a white system is through group advocacy. This is obviously mirroring a certain ideology created by a Jewish NEET.

Thirdly, since slavery, colonialism, lynchings, and numerous (likely fake) genocides happened because of the racist social construct of white identity (i.e. thinking you're justified in not giving niggers rights because you're white, justifying taking land from indians because they're not white) there can never, EVER, be a moment where Western history is shown in a positive light. White people must be demonized so that they realize what a horrible thing the racist social construct of whiteness is and the atrocities it has caused. This is what motivates these antiwhite shit-tier nigger """"historians"""" like the lady at the 1619 project who was debunked so hard by actually legitimate historians that she chimped out and claimed that white people were rayciss for even thinking of correcting her.

Lastly, as a white person you have inadvertently benefitted from the racist social construct of whiteness and can therefore never understand what it's like to NOT have benefitted from it. This is the most critical point in understanding the leftist psyche. They believe that YOU are the problem and must change NOW so they can get the society they want. That's why you can't correct or police nonwhites when they talk about their experiences with racism, you are eternally entrenched in your white privilege so you can never understand their struggle. Once white people accept their white guilt they can begin the (false) path of overcoming their own racism and making it to the rainbow's end where there's pots of gold and equity for all! "Equity" is a nice buzzword they like to use: it basically means creating a society where people are given what they need according to their race, class, gender, etc.

I think that once you realize modern day leftism is built on these false assumptions you can begin to combat it. Firstly, hit them with biological race being real. Point out that race denial is a recent phenomenon in western countries since the 70's, tops. Point out how the study of race has been demonized since the end of the second world war. Proving that race is a biological reality is the absolute most important thing you will have to accomplish first since it demolishes the false pretenses that most of the other points operate on. History is more tricky since libtards and nonwhites are fed tiny snippets of false information to create a picture of evil, racist, genocidal Europeans. Simply bring up incidents of nonwhites unjustifiably like the Haitian genocide or Nat Turners rebellion (niggers brutally killing children). They will either have to excuse it or worse, justify the deaths of innocent whites. That or you can deboonk popular myths like Tulsa or Emmet Till. I bet you none of them have ever heard an alternative perspective and just blindly believed whatever the media said. If you can make it this far without them getting mad and quitting on you, THEN you can bring up crime/IQ disparities without being dismissed as a loony white supremacist. Too many people sperg out and forget that they are operating under a totally different framework which makes any disparity between blacks and whites the fault of racism. Addressing the moral framing that leftists use comes FIRST, otherwise you will both be bored and frustrated as a devout Christian would debating a Muslim on whether Christ was the son of God with both referring to their own respective holy books which they believe without a shred of doubt. By opening up the difference between racialist biological whiteness versus antiracist sociological whiteness you can begin having a debate.

Hope you appreciate this PSA