№65034
>>65033that leads to another contradiction of anarchism: there's no state, so whos gonna shoot the nazi chuds who post troonjaks
№65036
>>65034you said under anarchism they would get shot but then now you say they wouldnt
№65038
>>65036Most anarchists want chuddies to get shot but they wouldn’t have the means organize against them
№65039
>>65038I mean chuds do mass shootings all of the time
№65040
>>65039Yea but their ideal society doesn’t contradict their actions
№65063
>>65061what are the rules
№65069
And more importantly who enforces xim/xer pronouns?
№65070
>>65063I wouldn’t be allowed to post troonjaks, or privately own any means of production
№65071
>Why does "anarchism" inevitably lead to the strictest rules?
No rules breeds chaos which breeds the need in mans heart to be ruled by “oppressive” regimes
№65072
>>65070Reddit didnt exist when Kropotkin was around meds
№65073
>>65072>KropotkinMarge, my skin isn’t the color of poop so I don’t know what that is
№65075
>>65062Haha seethe more Kikeswine
№65079
Because Warlordism is based