№109712
fuck niggers
№109713
nothingburger kys schizo
№109714
>>109711Baby Jaks we know are embedded
Mutt Jak
Chicken wing jak
№109716
>>109715Yes that one is not embedded but others are
№109717
>>109715its in the pixels
we need to find the original baby image
№109718
>>109715A few months ago the baby mutt was literally embedded, there’s a jak on the boors making fun of it saying it’s embedded
№109719
>>109717Those pixels are necessary to evade hashbans THOUGH, albeit it might be possible to embed extra data using their position and color information
№109720
>pedocoalers will now try to make embedded babies to kill the gem
№109722
oh fuck
№109723
>>109721>>109720Stfu false flagging faggot how the fuck does this thread sound like a cord op
№109724
flood system idiots
№109725
>>109723you're bad at hiding it
make 10+ theads at the same time and any 80+ IQ monkey would notice
№109726
>>109723tsmt
all of the baba.zip is safe
№109727
>>109726>>109725You are literally posting a GENUINE cord Jak
WHAT FUCKING REASON WOULD A CORD HAVE TO BE AGANIST P
№109728
holy shit i found one with 'p from june
you can just erase the text and save and its good, right??? the only embed is the letters that you have to mspaint paint bucket to see, right?
№109729
>>109728just don't save or post any babyjaks. two months ago i got permabanned for posting a babyjak i thought was safe, i never got an explanation from the mods and the appeal was denied. fuck these pedophiles for literally killing the sharty
№109732
babyjak is vantablack niggercoal anyway
"hahaha it's a BABY and it's LOW QUALITY!!!!! WOWW!!!!"
ugh
№109734
>>109729man the falseflags are extra spicy today
№109735
>>109718nope
i made that image and im not in any cord or 'p group so its probably amerimutt seethe, as per usual
if there is an embedded link in this, it must be because of the babyjak i used before downscaling it
№109736
>>109735checked it, he's just lying
dont worry about it
№109738
>>109737>mental gymnasticsits barely a couple of pixels, for 4 letters it'd need to be 5px in height, 15px in length
the triangle is way smaller then that
plus all the 'cord "proof" pics have the linkk in the top right corner
№109739
I analyzed a few of the automated babyjaks. All of them contain exactly 9 dots positioned randomly with a random color. The images are ALWAYS 93x125 pixels, so each dot has 11625 spots in which it could be placed.
In total there are ~3 undecillion combinations for positions alone, not even counting all of the 16 million colors each dot could have. This is more than enough room to store a link.
However, if there were any data simply encoded in the dots, it would not look random, because links are short and similar. It would have to be encrypted or mixed with lots of random padding data.
I don't think there is anything embedded in the dots of the babybot though, because this would be quite a sophisticated algorithm and a mental gymnastic schizo explanation for the dots. Not to mention it would require another algorithm just to decode them. It is far more likely and realistic that the dots are just random to evade the hashban.
№109740
>>109739my theory was the random words were obtained by asking AI to generate words that would illicit certain emotions.
the word "mean" comes up super frequently in the random words
№109741
>>109739or however the 'P link embeds
№109743
>>109742Your psyop has failed, you can go back to posting interracial porn xister.
№109744
>>109740>random words were obtained by asking AI to generate words that would illicit certain emotions.That would be very expensive, the bot would have to query ChatGPT for every single thread on the site, or at least often enough to have enough random words. And I don't think random words can effectively be used to illicit certain emotions anyway.
№109746
>>109745>other thing existsirrelevant.
№109747
>'p spam thread that shits up the site gets posted
<NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO DELETE THIS NOW MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODSSSSSS
>baby spam thread that shits up the site gets posted
<sharty saving gemerald
№109751
>>109745literally no baby booru image has an embedded url doe, atleast not any recent ones
№109752
>>109744You went to extreme lengths to disprove the "babybot p" theory in OP without providing any evidence
now that you reply to my theory you have zero critical think and retard level reasoning?
a AI can easily produce such things and randomize it
№109753
>>109752>You went to extreme lengths to disprove the "babybot p" theory in OP without providing any evidenceWhat evidence do I need to provide? The burden of proof is on you.
>a AI can easily produce such things and randomize itIt can, but it doesn't look like this is the case, the words are almost always random and unrelated to anything. And in cases where there SEEMS to be a theme, it can easily be a coincidence, because it happens rarely.
My point still stands that it would be expensive to generate enough words with AI to post in every single thread on the site. And even if it did that, do you really think that you could put le evil subliminal messagerino into random words and have it actually affect the site?
№109754
>>109753the reason the bot posts random words is to bypass the spam filter, it used to post "first" and "im baby" but it kept getting shot down so its now resorting to random sentences in order to stay up
№109757
>>109753>make claims as proof for your point>ERMMMMM NO YOU HAVE TO GO PROVE WHAT I SAIDretard
№109758
>>109756GEG
Opacity up
FAIL
picked the wrong image xister
№109760
wait hold on
№109761
>>109713>>109715this is pizzagate all over again
take the redpill and accept reality
№109762
>>109759>announcing your psyop beforehandgeg
№109763
>>109714my muttbaby wasnt embedded and I checked
№109764
>>109757All I said in my post (
>>109739 ) is HOW the random dots COULD contain 'p, and why that is unlikely. What proof do I need to provide for that? Do you want me to explain the math? Show you the dots? Or do you want a trusted expert and a verified source to tell you this?
№109765
>>109761so then it's real
got it.
№109766
>>109765did you see the replies doll made on /q/ when asked about the p?
№109769
>>109768embedded zoophilia
№109771
>>109768>155kbayup, assa 'mbed
№109773
>>109770this nucob is NOT from 358 years in the future
№109774
>>109773check the unix time again 'tard
№109778
>massreplying
yep, it's discord trying to derail the thread
can only imagine why
№109779
>>109778why have you been trying to push that “mass replying is le cord” even when mass replying is both /qa/ and sharty culture
№109781
>>109779because the same faggots who are left over from /qa/ are all discord?
№109784
>>109783>/qa/ purofaggot>trying to say it isnt discordwow thats suprising
№109786
>>109777what would you think will be the first 1700000000 image on the sharty since it's in 3 months
№109790
>>109789you said the exact same thing before. nice job
№109792
>>109790Geeeeg holy meds
(Flood detected; post discarded)
№109796
discord did an amazing job derailing this thread. take notes glowniggers/jidf
№109797
>>109787geg i’ll mass reply in more threads as long as it makes you have schizophrenic breakdowns
№109799
>>109798you would’ve hated /qa/
№109800
>>109799>I transheart boards full of tranime posters and actual trannysyea you're right I would've
№109801
>>109735>>109736Kill yourself obsessed faggot
№109806
chud^18 (writer of
>>109728) here, my vpn took a bit long to connect to but i opened the 'p link on tor, it was an image hosted on kereste which i believe is owned by kuz, what does this mean?
№110246
verdict is that babyjak is vantablack niggerstone you can go home now
№110247
>>1098151) proxies exist
2) the geoip db used is inaccurate ss fuck so a somali ip may appear as icelandic or whatever
>>110215'p links which is hidden on first sight but can be revealed with a hex editor or paintbucket tool