/sci/ - Soyence and Technology

>>10257
I don't know what this is but you're a NEEEEEEERD!
Time to shove you into the locker and then I make out with my smokin' hot babe after that!

>>10258
I saw your gay sex tape

>>10259
You owe me lunch money

>>10261
I fucked your mother.

Real question. What's wrong with systemd except muh bloat and Lennart Poettering bad?

>>10269
one obvious thing portability, I can't tell you anything wrong about systemd because it doesn't even work on my OS

>>10269
nothing
every argument against systemd is laughable

>>10270
UNIX and Linux are synonyms in the year of our lord 2023. your shitty toy OS might as well not even exist, BSD cuck.

>>10274
>a toy OS runs 90% of the IT infrastructure of the world
deluded wintoddler

>>10275
Let me know when your OS beats 'Unknown' lil bro

Luke Smith endorsed SystemD so I like it

>>10278
I don't think Kane would endorse Glownigger Defense Initiative shit.

Linux IAS

>>10276
let me know when your OS lets you remove the trans flag from your taskbar lil bro
>>10277
BSD cuck cope

>>10281
linux and freebsd are truly NAS
>>10282
linuxCuck cope

>>10269
nothing aside from it being faster than openrc, having all the features you need, having a working syntax, and working in general
...unlike openrc
>>10270
silly toy OS
>>10275
was about to say that, and ACKCHYUALLY, 96.3%
plus all the embedded shit if you count busybox, gnu, and all the other shit that uses a lunix kernel as "lunix"
>>10276
>frfr lil bro niguh ong ngl &128128; &128128;
most of "unknown" is GNU/Linux that doesnt report itself being GNU like all the spyware operating systems that hand out data to anyone who asks
>>10277
BSD is a toy OS, GNU runs the entire world now.
>what the masses use
if that was the correct choice then winglows would be a good operating system
(spoiler: its not)
BSD is just unusable, aside from that it contains proprietary malware so im not running that cucked iToddler cocksucker trash.
>>10282
kek, the wintoddler sheep who thinks he has to use what every other sheep uses is angry
>>10283
lunix is nas, i dont use lunix doe
i run lunix-libre, and might install hurd or a deblobbed openBSD kernel, whenever either one becomes usable

>>10288
>>what the masses use
>if that was the correct choice then winglows would be a good operating system
you do realise that is talking about the 96.3 percent of linux, right?
>BSD is just unusable
skill issue
>aside from that it contains proprietary malware
sudo ed /usr/src/sys/config/X86_64_GENERIC
and remove what you want
>cucked iToddler cocksucker trash.
>even doe linux linux is the one that works on macs and my system only supports amd64
>deblobbed openBSD kernel
fail

>>10296
it is the standard editor, you can replace it with the editor of your choice
infact: sudo $EDITOR /usr/src/sys/config/X86_64_GENERIC

>>10296
>>10298
When I log into my Xenix system with my 110 baud teletype, both vi and Emacs are just too damn slow. They print useless messages like, ‘C-h for help’ and ‘“foo” File is read only’. So I use the editor that doesn't waste my VALUABLE time.

Ed, man! !man ed

ED(1) Unix Programmer's Manual ED(1)

NAME
ed - text editor

SYNOPSIS
ed [ - ] [ -x ] [ name ]
DESCRIPTION
Ed is the standard text editor.

Computer Scientists love ed, not just because it comes first alphabetically, but because it's the standard. Everyone else loves ed because it's ED!

“Ed is the standard text editor.”

And ed doesn't waste space on my Timex Sinclair. Just look:

-rwxr-xr-x 1 root 24 Oct 29 1929 /bin/ed
-rwxr-xr-t 4 root 1310720 Jan 1 1970 /usr/ucb/vi
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root 5.89824e37 Oct 22 1990 /usr/bin/emacs
Of course, on the system I administrate, vi is symlinked to ed. Emacs has been replaced by a shell script which 1) Generates a syslog message at level LOG_EMERG; 2) reduces the user's disk quota by 100K; and 3) RUNS ED!!!!!!

“Ed is the standard text editor.”

Let's look at a typical novice's session with the mighty ed:

golem$ ed

?
help
?
?
?
quit
?
exit
?
bye
?
hello?
?
eat flaming death
?
^C
?
^C
?
^D
?

Note the consistent user interface and error reportage. Ed is generous enough to flag errors, yet prudent enough not to overwhelm the novice with verbosity.

“Ed is the standard text editor.”

Ed, the greatest WYGIWYG editor of all.

ED IS THE TRUE PATH TO NIRVANA! ED HAS BEEN THE CHOICE OF EDUCATED AND IGNORANT ALIKE FOR CENTURIES! ED WILL NOT CORRUPT YOUR PRECIOUS BODILY FLUIDS!! ED IS THE STANDARD TEXT EDITOR! ED MAKES THE SUN SHINE AND THE BIRDS SING AND THE GRASS GREEN!!

When I use an editor, I don't want eight extra KILOBYTES of worthless help screens and cursor positioning code! I just want an EDitor!! Not a “viitor”. Not a “emacsitor”. Those aren't even WORDS!!!! ED! ED! ED IS THE STANDARD!!!

TEXT EDITOR.

When IBM, in its ever-present omnipotence, needed to base their “edlin” on a Unix standard, did they mimic vi? No. Emacs? Surely you jest. They chose the most karmic editor of all. The standard.

Ed is for those who can remember what they are working on. If you are an idiot, you should use Emacs. If you are an Emacs, you should not be vi. If you use ED, you are on THE PATH TO REDEMPTION. THE SO-CALLED “VISUAL” EDITORS HAVE BEEN PLACED HERE BY ED TO TEMPT THE FAITHLESS. DO NOT GIVE IN!!! THE MIGHTY ED HAS SPOKEN!!!

?

>>10257
Anyone who uses systemD, guhnome, wayland, flatpaks, rhel or fedora should just end their pathetic life already.

>>10311
all gemeralds except rhel and systemd

>>10295
its only used on professional servers, by people who know what theyre doing
>durr hurr edit the sauces manually AFTER installing the system full of blobs or something like that
>openBSD
>sudo
kek

>>10312
stop smoking crack FEDora = beta testing branch of rhel. You might as well use Windows as Fedora is going to be loaded with a bunch of telemetry.

>>10313
>>openbsd
>>sudo
>kek
did you even check the image? you must be the person with the lowest attention span I have ever seen in my entire life.

>>10257
I chudheart runit (fast simple and painless)

>>10295
>openbsd
>sudo
failerald

>>10325
I think I already said 4 times that I don't use openbsd and my screenshot shows DragonFly as the output of uname
so any further discussion on openBSD in this post is pointless and irrelevant, DragonFlyBSD will always remain the only relevant BSD system
for openbsd use this post or something: >>10299

I’ve never used Artix or Void but I heard they were unstable doe

>>10327
they are
use slackware if you want something stable

>>10504
>wordswordswords
The left can't meme

>>10539
BSD != doas
do you take all your information from youtube?

>>10583
the fact that white men use su and nothing else has nothing to do with your trannyware distro

>>10583
BSD has 1/30th of Linux's marketshare. Given that Linux only has about 10 people using it that means there is 1 nigger (which is about 1/3rd of a person) using BSD.

>>10708
UNIX users be like
>sudo install software
>sudo share file with a user
>sudo bring up the network
>sudo connect to wifi
>sudo format a USB drive
>sudo install updates
>sudo mount a hard drive
>sudo change the time
>sudo shutdown the computer
how does anyone use UNIX without superuser access?

>>10725
GNOME Shell doesn't need SUDO for everything

>>10732
because of SUID bit. With UNIX you get two levels of permissions: can't do anything and can reflash the BIOS. No in between. Well maybe if you count "can use the serial ports" (dialout).

>>10733
in windows you have destroy your system and destroy your system XL 2 including house burning functionality

>>10735
Windows NT has granular permissions for every object and file. You do not need superuser to create a special group to be able to share a file with another user. You can literally have a GP rule that disables access to Chrome Incognito Mode every Tuesday between 4 and 7

>>11181
chmod does too, you can assign specific groups for specific users using specific ACLs and specific GUIDs, any poor fuck that has to manage a large remote network with some tardsolaris knows this, and Windows's default is actually a bit more shit tier than the average Linux distro, and you can schedule the same policies with a cron that edits configs to glowium or whatever, or use soystemd-saturnd or what have you if you're an idiot that can't comprehend fucking cron

>>11331
>chmod does too, you can assign specific groups for specific users
chown can only be run by superuser. chmod only allows for changing owner, group, and everyone with rwx, not granular.
>specific ACLs and specific GUIDs
Nobody uses ACLs on Linux (not a UNIX feature) and are not supported in any major desktop environment or file manager.
>and you can schedule the same policies with a cron
This is a hack. Manually modifying config files and synchronizing crontab and misc shell scripts in a workgroup is not optimal and you know it. Said shell scripts would have to be manually written to cycle through users and apply patches to config files and databases. Even Mac OS supports some form of Windows style group policy. Active Directory automatically syncs Group Policy. Getting UNIX to synchronize user accounts via PAM/OpenLDAP or whatever is such a joke that where I work we get an Active Directory Login which is used for everything and a UNIX login which is ONLY used for connecting to the RHEL server to run builds. Even then permissions are broken and everyone can view everyone else's home folder.
>tardsolaris
Do you agree that NFS is the worst thing to ever have been created?

>>11331
Nobody uses POSIX ACLs
http://michael.orlitzky.com/articles/there_was_an_attempt_to_save_linux_filesystem_acls.xhtml